<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on 300, art, and objectivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One thing to add &#171; Notes from Evil Bender</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>One thing to add &#171; Notes from Evil Bender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-696</guid>
		<description>[...] Which brings me to a larger question: to what extent should we accept work on its own merits, and to what extent can we critique it for fa...? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which brings me to a larger question: to what extent should we accept work on its own merits, and to what extent can we critique it for fa&#8230;? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidD</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-645</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I turned to the dark side, Liz. Didn&#039;t you know? Turning evil for the sake of power alone, greed, or other pure selfishness is so ordinary and unbalanced. There has to be something else to make it heroic or tragic. Anakin is rather juvenile at the point of his conversion, but he is clearly coming to appreciate the existential joy of his power, however he uses it, for evil or for good, to release his anger or follow orders. But it&#039;s not just about power. It&#039;s about the existential joy of being connected to all sorts of things, also for evil or for good.

Part of real life turns to the dark side has been to become an instrument for whatever madman is in power, because of one&#039;s professionalism or other joy in one&#039;s talent. Hitler and Stalin both served visions that were bigger than they were, both being visions that could be spun in a positive way, and in turn they had many talented people become their instruments of terror. 

So George Lucas could have made Anakin a more mature character intent on a new galactic order for the good of everyone, not just to prove that he was as good a Jedi as anyone, even better, not just to save his wife, for whom he already broke the rules so she could be his wife. Anakin could have broken the rules in a big way, for good and for evil, only somehow the evil would dominate, as it has in reality. Ah, anyone can write that. But podracing and similarly loud running around in the vacuum of space was more exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I turned to the dark side, Liz. Didn&#8217;t you know? Turning evil for the sake of power alone, greed, or other pure selfishness is so ordinary and unbalanced. There has to be something else to make it heroic or tragic. Anakin is rather juvenile at the point of his conversion, but he is clearly coming to appreciate the existential joy of his power, however he uses it, for evil or for good, to release his anger or follow orders. But it&#8217;s not just about power. It&#8217;s about the existential joy of being connected to all sorts of things, also for evil or for good.</p>
<p>Part of real life turns to the dark side has been to become an instrument for whatever madman is in power, because of one&#8217;s professionalism or other joy in one&#8217;s talent. Hitler and Stalin both served visions that were bigger than they were, both being visions that could be spun in a positive way, and in turn they had many talented people become their instruments of terror. </p>
<p>So George Lucas could have made Anakin a more mature character intent on a new galactic order for the good of everyone, not just to prove that he was as good a Jedi as anyone, even better, not just to save his wife, for whom he already broke the rules so she could be his wife. Anakin could have broken the rules in a big way, for good and for evil, only somehow the evil would dominate, as it has in reality. Ah, anyone can write that. But podracing and similarly loud running around in the vacuum of space was more exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavlov112</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>pavlov112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-612</guid>
		<description>No, I&#039;m definitely thinking of you.  It&#039;s just that I&#039;m thinking incorrectly.  Must stop sprinkling crack in my morning coffee...  (I&#039;m sorry about that.  I honestly remember having that conversation with you recently and now can&#039;t for the life of me remember who the other person was.)

[MORE EPISODE III SPOILERS] I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to complain that Anakin&#039;s turn wasn&#039;t dark enough.  He ultimately redeems himself out of love for his children (&quot;Father, PLEEEEEEEEEASE&quot; zap crackle evil grin on Palpatine&#039;s face); if that love for them (and by extension, I suppose, their mother, since they are all that&#039;s left of her) is powerful enough to turn him in one direction, I don&#039;t see why it shouldn&#039;t turn him in another.  And let&#039;s face it - that Palpatine was one slick manipulator.

Does this mean that there are tits in The Departed, too?  Now I really have to buy it... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I&#8217;m definitely thinking of you.  It&#8217;s just that I&#8217;m thinking incorrectly.  Must stop sprinkling crack in my morning coffee&#8230;  (I&#8217;m sorry about that.  I honestly remember having that conversation with you recently and now can&#8217;t for the life of me remember who the other person was.)</p>
<p>[MORE EPISODE III SPOILERS] I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to complain that Anakin&#8217;s turn wasn&#8217;t dark enough.  He ultimately redeems himself out of love for his children (&#8220;Father, PLEEEEEEEEEASE&#8221; zap crackle evil grin on Palpatine&#8217;s face); if that love for them (and by extension, I suppose, their mother, since they are all that&#8217;s left of her) is powerful enough to turn him in one direction, I don&#8217;t see why it shouldn&#8217;t turn him in another.  And let&#8217;s face it &#8211; that Palpatine was one slick manipulator.</p>
<p>Does this mean that there are tits in The Departed, too?  Now I really have to buy it&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lizard Queen</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lizard Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-611</guid>
		<description>Pavlov112: &quot;As I told our blog hostess recently (another who has not yet seen Ep. III)...&quot;

Wait, is &quot;blog hostess&quot; supposed to refer to me (or do you have a connection to a blog that you&#039;re not telling me about)?  &#039;Cause if so, I think you&#039;re thinking of someone else.  I saw Episode III.  [WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD; scroll down to the next paragraph to avoid them...]  I&#039;m so naive and optimistic that I was actually excited by the previews for Episode III.  As I&#039;ve no doubt you can imagine, I was severely disappointed.  What stuck with me was not the bloodbath, not the fact that the movie was dark, but that, in a strange sense, it wasn&#039;t dark enough.  One of the best movie villains of all time became a villain &lt;i&gt;because he wanted to save the life of his wife and the mother of his children&lt;/i&gt;??  Anakin Skywalker turned to the dark side &lt;i&gt;for love&lt;/i&gt;??  That&#039;s the lamest thing I&#039;ve ever heard!  *Sigh*  Why does George Lucas hate me?

Cara: &quot;Going to see the The Departed and getting outraged about hearing some off-color and un-PC language is like going to a titty bar and getting outraged that you saw some tits.&quot;

:)  Love it!  I&#039;m inclined to agree.  On the other hand, though, when we study literature, we often move beyond authorial intent and into the autonomy of art; if a novel&#039;s author meant to write a simple coming-of-age story but everyone reads it as an anti-Stalinist diatribe, then how do we ultimately approach that novel?  (After all, Georgia O&#039;Keeffe was just trying to paint some flowers, and--if I remember my art history correctly--was rather chagrined at her first show to find that everyone thought they looked like vulvae...)  But then I look at the other side of &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; idea (what can I say, it&#039;s 2:30 am and I&#039;m good at seeing both sides of an argument anyway), and I think that if I were looking at the Departed as a &quot;text,&quot; if you will, I wouldn&#039;t say that it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;advocating&lt;/i&gt; racism, homophobia, etc., but rather that it&#039;s reflecting the racism, homophobia, etc. of a certain place at a certain time.

I do think it comes down in large part to, as you put it, being realistic about one&#039;s expectations for a movie/book/objet d’art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pavlov112: &#8220;As I told our blog hostess recently (another who has not yet seen Ep. III)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait, is &#8220;blog hostess&#8221; supposed to refer to me (or do you have a connection to a blog that you&#8217;re not telling me about)?  &#8216;Cause if so, I think you&#8217;re thinking of someone else.  I saw Episode III.  [WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD; scroll down to the next paragraph to avoid them...]  I&#8217;m so naive and optimistic that I was actually excited by the previews for Episode III.  As I&#8217;ve no doubt you can imagine, I was severely disappointed.  What stuck with me was not the bloodbath, not the fact that the movie was dark, but that, in a strange sense, it wasn&#8217;t dark enough.  One of the best movie villains of all time became a villain <i>because he wanted to save the life of his wife and the mother of his children</i>??  Anakin Skywalker turned to the dark side <i>for love</i>??  That&#8217;s the lamest thing I&#8217;ve ever heard!  *Sigh*  Why does George Lucas hate me?</p>
<p>Cara: &#8220;Going to see the The Departed and getting outraged about hearing some off-color and un-PC language is like going to a titty bar and getting outraged that you saw some tits.&#8221;</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Love it!  I&#8217;m inclined to agree.  On the other hand, though, when we study literature, we often move beyond authorial intent and into the autonomy of art; if a novel&#8217;s author meant to write a simple coming-of-age story but everyone reads it as an anti-Stalinist diatribe, then how do we ultimately approach that novel?  (After all, Georgia O&#8217;Keeffe was just trying to paint some flowers, and&#8211;if I remember my art history correctly&#8211;was rather chagrined at her first show to find that everyone thought they looked like vulvae&#8230;)  But then I look at the other side of <i>that</i> idea (what can I say, it&#8217;s 2:30 am and I&#8217;m good at seeing both sides of an argument anyway), and I think that if I were looking at the Departed as a &#8220;text,&#8221; if you will, I wouldn&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s <i>advocating</i> racism, homophobia, etc., but rather that it&#8217;s reflecting the racism, homophobia, etc. of a certain place at a certain time.</p>
<p>I do think it comes down in large part to, as you put it, being realistic about one&#8217;s expectations for a movie/book/objet d’art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavlov112</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>pavlov112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>As I told our blog hostess recently (another who has not yet seen Ep. III), that it was a bloodbath is what partly redeemed the prequels for me as a series.  It&#039;s just such a dark flick.  As I&#039;ve grown more circumspect (ie. once I grew beyond my initial-viewing-in-childhood reactions), I&#039;ve come to prefer Empire for the same reason, I think.

Of course, I may have been partly influenced by the Empire/Jedi/independent contractor discussion in Clerks... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I told our blog hostess recently (another who has not yet seen Ep. III), that it was a bloodbath is what partly redeemed the prequels for me as a series.  It&#8217;s just such a dark flick.  As I&#8217;ve grown more circumspect (ie. once I grew beyond my initial-viewing-in-childhood reactions), I&#8217;ve come to prefer Empire for the same reason, I think.</p>
<p>Of course, I may have been partly influenced by the Empire/Jedi/independent contractor discussion in Clerks&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Oh, I mean it&#039;s obviously okay to be disappointed in things, and have expectations/hopes...it&#039;s not as if I&#039;ve never disliked or been disappointed in a movie or book.  Mostly that&#039;s a matter of taste.  But I do advocate being realistic about what one can expect from a movie/book/objet d&#039;art and it&#039;s not more than the piece or its author intended.  Make sense?  So what I&#039;m saying is if the makers of the &lt;i&gt;The Departed&lt;/i&gt; had intended it to advance a social agenda, I&#039;m a monkey&#039;s uncle (is that how the phrase goes?).  I&#039;m pretty sure it was just meant to be a good ole Southie-style mother-fing movie remake about crooked cops and mobsters... and calling it out for not being PC is foolish at best.  I think it succeeded, remarkably well, in its intentions and I liked it.  I&#039;m sure some people didn&#039;t like it, and that&#039;s okay too.  But if they wanted a movie that was going to be PC and ended up at the one where everybody shoots everybody in South Boston, they went to the wrong movie in the first place.  And now, I haven&#039;t seen or read &lt;i&gt;300&lt;/i&gt;, but from what I understand of it, I think if people went to that hoping it would be something more than an obvious one-side-is-good-the-other-is-the-blackest-evil, they either like to set themselves up for disappointment or they went to the wrong movie too. 

I&#039;m with you about being generally disappointed in episodes 1 &amp; 2 (and I admit, somewhat ashamedly, that I still haven&#039;t even seen 3!), but I also am honest that episodes 4-6 have been kind of deified over the years too (really, could the prequels possibly have lived up to what legions of fans had been hoping for for 20 years?).  But then, the Yoda fight at the end of 2 was worth my $9 and then some :)

And also, from what I hear about episode 3, it was a blood bath of mothers... that&#039;s hardly a storyline for children.  So if George Lucas intended this episode to be (I think he changed his tune a little, from interviews I heard/read), then people rightly expected it and were disappointed.  That&#039;s legitimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I mean it&#8217;s obviously okay to be disappointed in things, and have expectations/hopes&#8230;it&#8217;s not as if I&#8217;ve never disliked or been disappointed in a movie or book.  Mostly that&#8217;s a matter of taste.  But I do advocate being realistic about what one can expect from a movie/book/objet d&#8217;art and it&#8217;s not more than the piece or its author intended.  Make sense?  So what I&#8217;m saying is if the makers of the <i>The Departed</i> had intended it to advance a social agenda, I&#8217;m a monkey&#8217;s uncle (is that how the phrase goes?).  I&#8217;m pretty sure it was just meant to be a good ole Southie-style mother-fing movie remake about crooked cops and mobsters&#8230; and calling it out for not being PC is foolish at best.  I think it succeeded, remarkably well, in its intentions and I liked it.  I&#8217;m sure some people didn&#8217;t like it, and that&#8217;s okay too.  But if they wanted a movie that was going to be PC and ended up at the one where everybody shoots everybody in South Boston, they went to the wrong movie in the first place.  And now, I haven&#8217;t seen or read <i>300</i>, but from what I understand of it, I think if people went to that hoping it would be something more than an obvious one-side-is-good-the-other-is-the-blackest-evil, they either like to set themselves up for disappointment or they went to the wrong movie too. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you about being generally disappointed in episodes 1 &amp; 2 (and I admit, somewhat ashamedly, that I still haven&#8217;t even seen 3!), but I also am honest that episodes 4-6 have been kind of deified over the years too (really, could the prequels possibly have lived up to what legions of fans had been hoping for for 20 years?).  But then, the Yoda fight at the end of 2 was worth my $9 and then some <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And also, from what I hear about episode 3, it was a blood bath of mothers&#8230; that&#8217;s hardly a storyline for children.  So if George Lucas intended this episode to be (I think he changed his tune a little, from interviews I heard/read), then people rightly expected it and were disappointed.  That&#8217;s legitimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavlov112</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>pavlov112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha ha.  I haven&#039;t seen the movie myself yet, so I&#039;m in no position to judge, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2007/03/4-word-movie-review.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is certainly a... pithy ... review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha ha.  I haven&#8217;t seen the movie myself yet, so I&#8217;m in no position to judge, but <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2007/03/4-word-movie-review.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> is certainly a&#8230; pithy &#8230; review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavlov112</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>pavlov112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-573</guid>
		<description>I agree with you in principle, C, and yet for some reason the recent Star Wars movies jump out at me.  George Lucas always talked about meaning them to be for kids, and yet I know so many people were disappinted by them.  Are we adults who&#039;ve grown up with the original trilogy being unreasonable in our disappointment that the prequels generally sucked?

Damn it.  Now all I can think is Anakin bitching about it being hot and sand getting everywhere.  Sure, Luke started off as a whiny brat (&quot;But I was going to Tosche Station to pick up some POWer converters!&quot;), but he grew out of it.  Bah.  I&#039;m not thinking very clearly today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you in principle, C, and yet for some reason the recent Star Wars movies jump out at me.  George Lucas always talked about meaning them to be for kids, and yet I know so many people were disappinted by them.  Are we adults who&#8217;ve grown up with the original trilogy being unreasonable in our disappointment that the prequels generally sucked?</p>
<p>Damn it.  Now all I can think is Anakin bitching about it being hot and sand getting everywhere.  Sure, Luke started off as a whiny brat (&#8220;But I was going to Tosche Station to pick up some POWer converters!&#8221;), but he grew out of it.  Bah.  I&#8217;m not thinking very clearly today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-572</guid>
		<description>It never makes any sense to me when people try to demand more from something, especially art/entertainment, than it ever meant to give.  That&#039;s just setting yourself up for disappointment and/or outrage, but then some people get off on being disappointed and/or outraged.  Going to see the &lt;i&gt;The Departed&lt;/i&gt; and getting outraged about hearing some off-color and un-PC language is like going to a titty bar and getting outraged that you saw some tits.  What the F were people expecting, you know?

I thought &lt;i&gt;The Departed&lt;/i&gt; was wicked pissah, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never makes any sense to me when people try to demand more from something, especially art/entertainment, than it ever meant to give.  That&#8217;s just setting yourself up for disappointment and/or outrage, but then some people get off on being disappointed and/or outraged.  Going to see the <i>The Departed</i> and getting outraged about hearing some off-color and un-PC language is like going to a titty bar and getting outraged that you saw some tits.  What the F were people expecting, you know?</p>
<p>I thought <i>The Departed</i> was wicked pissah, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Regan</title>
		<link>http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamthelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/thoughts-on-300-art-and-objectivity/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>&quot;I and others have pointed out that the movie was very true to character in that that’s exactly how people from Southie talk&quot; 

From what I understand it was actually the other way around that the Spartans would have been the target of the man-boy-love jokes of the Athenians, but of course the Spartans were the heros of the movie so they had switch that around. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livescience.com/history/070312_300_movie.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is a great article talking about the historical accuracy of the movie. Also, the wikipedia entry on the battle of Thermoplyae and the rest of the war is a fascinating read. The Greek did some amazing things to defend their country but there was also a fair bit of luck involved. A significant part of the Persian fleet was destroyed by a storm.

I thought the Spartans were portrayed a little two one dimensionally for my tastes, the &quot;look how manly I am with my chiseled body, gruff nicotine rattled voice, and emotionless demeanor&quot; theme got old for me. They also didn&#039;t give the Athenians much credit for their contribution to the battle. It did stick to the comic book pretty closely though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I and others have pointed out that the movie was very true to character in that that’s exactly how people from Southie talk&#8221; </p>
<p>From what I understand it was actually the other way around that the Spartans would have been the target of the man-boy-love jokes of the Athenians, but of course the Spartans were the heros of the movie so they had switch that around. <a href="http://www.livescience.com/history/070312_300_movie.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is a great article talking about the historical accuracy of the movie. Also, the wikipedia entry on the battle of Thermoplyae and the rest of the war is a fascinating read. The Greek did some amazing things to defend their country but there was also a fair bit of luck involved. A significant part of the Persian fleet was destroyed by a storm.</p>
<p>I thought the Spartans were portrayed a little two one dimensionally for my tastes, the &#8220;look how manly I am with my chiseled body, gruff nicotine rattled voice, and emotionless demeanor&#8221; theme got old for me. They also didn&#8217;t give the Athenians much credit for their contribution to the battle. It did stick to the comic book pretty closely though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
