October 3, 2007

ZOMG! They be killing Shakespeare OH NOES!!

Posted in Education, Literature, Wingnuts at 8:31 pm by The Lizard Queen

(Post title adapted from this post by Michael Bérubé.)

So, on the one hand we have an administrator halting the performance of a play that could easily pique students’ interest in Shakespeare. On the other, though, we have Phyllis Schlafly complaining that “Shakespeare has disappeared from required courses in English departments at more than three-fourths of the top 25 U.S. universities” (see Evil Bender for an analysis of Schlafly’s problematic composition skills, of which her citing statistics without evidence is merely one example).

My guess as to why English departments are likely to offer courses that “deconstruct” (according to Schlafly — I wouldn’t necessarily use that word) Shakespeare and other Medieval or Renaissance writers is that most English majors have already read Shakespeare. They got the basics in high school, and are now ready to delve deeper, examining sexuality across the comedies, say (and anyone who thinks sex and sexuality aren’t an issue in Shakespeare’s plays is fooling themselves). Personally, I read Romeo & Juliet in 9th grade, Hamlet in 10th, Macbeth in 11th, and King Lear in 12th.  (And then I read King Lear in Proseminar in Literature my freshman year of college.  And then I read King Lear in Brit Lit I my sophomore year.  It’s a wonderful play, but man, was I ready to get away from it for a while.)  Also, I was sound tech for our drama department’s performance of Much Ado About Nothing.  If anything can be taken from my experience, it’s that English majors have plenty of experience with the classics.  What, then, is so wrong with both students and professors wanting to expand the canon to include more women, more writers of color, more outsiders, more queers?

Oh, wait.  I forgot who I was talking about.

[h/t Sadly, No! via Shakesville]

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. luaphacim said,

    I am convinced that those who are most vocal about the Importance of Studying Shakespeare are those who have the least experience actually reading him. I have a hard time seeing P. Schlaf, for instance, getting many kicks out of jokes about hanging one’s bugle in an invisible baldrick or making the two-backed beast, which were Shakespeare’s bread and butter. Not to mention “the small gilded fly / Does lecher in my sight.” 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: